>The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry was established in New York in February 2018. In April, it tabled a 52-page petition and 57 exhibits before the Attorney General. Southern District of New York. At the end of the six-month statutory period, the Board appointed a Grand Jury to review the complaint.
>At this stage, the Committee of Jurists does not question the Bush version of the attacks of September 11, 2001. It does not comment on the impact of the two aircraft that struck two of the three destroyed buildings. It focuses exclusively on the presence of explosives in the WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 towers. He finds that the role they played that day is a federal crime that has not been prosecuted for the time being.
>In the past, prosecutor Geoffrey S. Berman was for two years the associate of Rudy Giuliani, mayor of New York at the time. Mr. Giuliani had called on his fellow citizens to evacuate towers WTC1 and WTC2 after they had been hit by airliners in view of the risks they had in his view crumbling. However, the buildings were built to withstand much more violent shocks.
>The grand jury should be held in 2019. It will be the first time, eighteen years after the crimes, that the US civil (not military) justice will look at one aspect of the attacks of 9/11.
I suppose the mod will find some reason to ban me for this post but this is important news that is not being widely reported. Whatever.
Any judicial proceeding such as this means that for the first time real rules of evidence will have to be applied to the investigation and not just the convenient suppositions of zionist controlled media.
I don't think I should have to wait two years before posting this.
>real rules of evidence will have to be applied to the investigation
They could just declare them unimportant, like they did for the Nuremburg show trials. This is great though, because even a tiny amount of real evidence getting through tears the whole charade down.
Bump for justice for the 6 million who died on that day
bump for the 60 million that died that day you antisemite you
C'mon now, come clean; you know it's strictly speaking "the six gorillion".
Bump because all of those >muh joos >muh degeneracy threads that are starting to overrun this place much like they did halfchan
I heard it was several six hundred gorrilion
the day he names pissrael and saud arabia then I will celebrate, until then it is what is ( ( (obviously) ) ) is
i heard rumors about this, didnt think it was gonna happen.
What about WTC7? The most obvious controlled demolition of the bunch
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
It’s another Shoah! oy 60 Trillions upon billions of billions gorrilions vey.
>Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
See for yourself: https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/about2/
Top name on their Board? Ed Asner, actor; born Yitzhak Edward Asner
And so on. They'll conclude responsibility for 9/11 was anybody but themselves.
God damnit. Every time.
Every anons duty to only refer to him by his real name throughout proceedings.
Imagine Nuremburg being presided over by high ranking Germans. I mean it was presided over by the plaintiffs, but imagine if the accused were allowed to preside.
This is Fabulous Good News. The 'Corbett Report' had a scoop on this activity of this Lawyers' Committee a few months ago, and James conducted an interview with the legal group's founding attorney.
The hasbarat jews will probably be all over this thread with a flood of irrelevant images soon.
>>Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
Well fuck I was doing the pee-pee dance in anticipation until I got to this post.
>They'll conclude responsibility for 9/11 was anybody but themselves.
Some combination of Iran, Scott Ritter, and Saddam Hussein, no doubt.
I am not trans, and I will stop talking when you make me stop talking.
I am sun man, I only chase women. Stay man.
You didn't do too well in school on reading comprehension.
It's the Grand Jury that will make a decision, not the backers and members of the group bringing the lawsuit.
Ah, but …NOTHING TO SEE HERE. GOYS…it's all doom and gloom.
Just in time for statute of limitations on illegal demolition of a privately owned building and insurance fraud?
Son of a gun.
kike, kike - weasel like.
I always wonder about that "rules of evidence." I tried looking up the definition but it did not clarify the issue much for me. Like it could mean that evidence is admitted that might normally be barred? Or that claims don't necessarily need to meet a normal threshold of evidence to be considered?
>newfag doesn't want to lurk two more years.
You can have a pass this time. This is more important than most of the shit being spewed on this board right now.
Here area the petition and it's summary
>Nuremberg show trials
As if that's some standard of abnormality, and not, in fact what has simply been the status quo of the semetized injustice system. As if evidence or logic hold any bearing on the so called rule of law
>"It was us all along, but you can't legally do anything about it now"
I would love to see them try that in public.
I think it means that to make an assertion you must have evidence.
If me and my kikenvermin lawyer accuse you of being the kingpin of a child sex slave ring that brings in 10 bajillion dollars a year then we must produce proof through financial documents or communications with your confederates and testimony from children with massively fucked assholes that you are in fact that what we claim you are.
We simply cannot appear on CNN and tell Don Lemon that you are a child fuck kingpin as he nods his head with a frown on his idiot shitskin face, and that's enough
We are on the cusp of greatness
Do it faggots. You know you can't resist gloating anyway.
Well worded, especially the bit about aiding and abetting. Would definitely have like to seen something about Larry Silverstein in there though.
It's quite obvious that they never intend to seek justice or to uncover the truth, and that the ruling is already a foregone conclusion. The value in this gift is that it legitimizes the questioning of the status quo. It provides an opportunity to explain that
>Jet fuel don't melt steel beams
is not based on the fallacious notion that superstructures of WTC 1&2 would have needed to have been heated to a molten state before undergoing synchronous catastrophic failure, but is in fact a reference to the footage of molten iron pouring from the windows of the towers immediately prior to collapse, and that globs of solidified steel were found in the debris in the aftermath of 9/11
A lot depends on who is sitting on that grand jury. Grand juries are very odd creatures, a real anomaly in western or even world jurisprudence; a small group of ordinary people suddenly and temporarily becomes a kind of fourth branch of government with plenary powers. This can swing either way; it can become a powerful vehicle for injustice or justice. If the jurors are old and crusty enough they can defy the prosecuting attorneys and even the presiding judge himself. Ideally they should consist of old time yankee farmers from New Hampshire or Maine, really cranky old fuckers that don't respect any authority and aren't afraid to make their opinions known.
I'm guessing the people who pick the grand jury will make sure that doesn't happen, and when it does, it's because they wanted it.
Furthermore, once they get rolling they can keep on rolling. They don't necessarily have to stay constrained to the original petition or filing. They can decide to just stay on sitting and digging for more shit once they get on the trail of a crime.
Grand juries play a major role in the U.S. criminal justice system.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller has called upon a federal grand jury to help him investigate Russia’s role in the 2016 election. It is a logical step in an investigation where there is some evidence that needs to be be gathered. Even before this grand jury, there was another grand jury impaneled to look into business dealings and campaign contacts of President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. The new grand jury widens the scope of the investigation, and it is likely focusing on others associated with the Trump campaign.
A grand jury does not mean that the investigation will lead to any formal criminal charges, which are known as indictments. There was a grand jury that issued subpoenas during the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, for example, but no one was charged with any crimes.
In order to understand grand juries and their work, I offer the following explanation of how federal and state grand juries are used in the U.S.
Legal basis: Federal and state
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides the legal basis for grand juries. In federal criminal cases, federal grand juries are made up of 16 to 23 members. They decide whether to indict someone who is being investigated, and at least 12 grand jurors need to agree to issue an indictment.
In addition to considering whether individuals may have committed a crime, a grand jury can also be used by a prosecutor as an investigative tool to compel witnesses to testify or turn over documents. Reports indicate Mueller is using a grand jury for the latter.
Makeup of a grand jury
Grand jurors are usually chosen from the same jury pool as trial jurors. For a federal grand jury, all U.S. citizens over the age of 18 living in the federal district court’s geographic jurisdiction are in the pool.
Court clerks first identify members of the grand jury pool from public records, including records of licensed drivers and registered voters.
Next, prospective grand jurors are screened, usually through questionnaires.
To be a member of a federal grand jury, a person has to be adequately proficient in English, have no disqualifying mental or physical condition, not be currently subject to felony charges punishable by imprisonment for more than one year and never have been convicted of a felony (unless civil rights have been legally restored). The court then randomly chooses candidates for the grand jury from this pool.
9/11 was Russians confirmed
Oh how predictable! SHUT IT DOWN, GOYIM!
If they arent filing for the extradition of the mossad kikes bush let go then they are covering up 9/11 some more.
>>At this stage, the Committee of Jurists does not question the Bush version of the attacks of September 11, 2001. It does not comment on the impact of the two aircraft that struck two of the three destroyed buildings.
Hello Nuremberg. Long time old buddy.
Murder doesn't have a statute of limitations. Terrorism doesn't have a statute of limitations.*
Treason doesn't have a statute of limitations*
*not sure about last two
I don't think you get quite what they're doing; they all agree, even Ed Asner that Mossad did it…
What they are doing here is driving a wedge in. If they can prove that explosives were used in taking down the towers then this cracks open the armor plate that has been protecting the conspirators of 911. That is huge. There will be ramifications.
Ed Asner may be a jew but he's a jew pointing the finger directly at Larry Silverstein.
Asner signed a statement released by the organization 9/11 Truth in 2004 that calls for a new investigation into the September 11 attacks. A brief summary of the reasons for his position appears in a video available on YouTube. Asner confirmed his support for the statement in 2009. Asner also narrated the documentary film The Oil Factor: Behind the War on Terror.
Asner served as the spokesman for 2004 Racism Watch. In April 2004, he wrote an open letter to "peace and justice leaders" encouraging them to demand "full 9-11 truth" through the organization 9-11 Visibility Project. In 2011, Asner hosted the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth documentary on the collapse of 7 World Trade Center that concludes that the building was taken down by controlled demolition.
Yeah, kikes and arabs are actually that sort of retarded. This is why they're always so absolutely assblasted offended whenever they simply get called on their shit and ran out or beaten by an angry mob. They literally can not tell the difference between 'technically' or 'legally' correct, and ethically right or wrong.
>implying the population isn't so doped up on (((medicine))) that they'd care
It's depressing but I'm not quite sure even hard evidence of israel's role in 9/11 would change 90% of the countries feelings on israel one way or the other.
>beams melted by something other than jet fuel
Anon… there is a problem. This inquiry is about "explosives" and not incendiaries. The kikes will use this as a means of rejecting evidence about thermite.
I knew a lot of people who joined special forces after this shit happened, specifically because they lost family in the attack. If they can be convinced that this was in fact, the kikes, and that they have been fighting for the monsters that killed their parents… we don't need that 90%.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth are behind this too.
>The U.S. Attorney’s letter does not spell out the steps that will be taken to comply, but 18 U.S.C. § 3332 is clear as to what these steps must be. This law states: “[a]ny such [United States] attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the [Special] grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney's action or recommendation.” This law also states that “(a) It shall be the duty of each such [special] grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.”
This letter from the U.S. Attorney was signed by Michael Ferrara and Ilan Graff, Chiefs, Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit. On November 24, 2018, the Lawyers’ Committee replied, thanking the U.S. Attorney and expressing support for a thorough inquiry into the crimes reported in the Lawyers’ Committee’s petitions.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC buildings. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of explosions at the WTC on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The Lawyers’ Committee’s July 30th Amended Petition addresses several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11 and increasing the tragic loss of life.
Everybody I know hates the jews - people where I work, neighbors of mine, etc., Not long ago I said some derogatory things about Blacks, and a female professional I am acquainted with immediately jumped to their defense with a ton of tedious cliches … slavery, unequal school funding, and etc. HOWEVER, as soon as I said the first negative thing about the jews she transformed and declared her support for what I was saying.
Only jews "like" jews, and even they can only stand living in Israel for a few years.
Most other people loathe them.
This is why the holocaust is so important.
better yet, I combined all three.
Kikes should be expected to engage in kikery just as they have always done, such is inevitable when dealing with kikes. However, as I said before, the objective is not to obtain justice via the legal system; as desirable as that may be, it would take a weilder of untold levels of turboautism to influence the outcome of the grand jewery via the internet, and at any rate, this is likely an inefficient application of said autismistic powers. The opportunity lies in bringing this matter to public light, in making it socially acceptable to question the traditional narrative as given by decree of the almighty MSM.
WTC3? wtf? I'm sure there is a building 3, never heard it mentioned before. Could OP be refering to WTC7, the third building to magically fall at freefall speed after minor fire damage?
Unless the glaring WTC7 bomb evidence is conveniently forgot because >>12559109
But, ya, prob just a silly typo
>Just in time for statute of limitations on illegal demolition of a privately owned building and insurance fraud?
This is what I could never fucking figure out. Insurance companies are notorious for sniffing out fraud and shit in order to not pay on a claim. On billions of dollars in payouts one would think they could get some pretty good analysis on the whole scenario. And FFS
SPECIALLY BLDG 7
But nothing not a peep and the top jew owner breaks it off deeper with a double payout.
But then the govt bailed out AIG or some shit after everything and I could not be assed to go and figure out the shit though.
>I suppose the mod will find some reason to ban me for this post but this is important news that is not being widely reported. Whatever.
"Q" supports the official 9/11 narrative… do the ops as well?
>i'm a newfag
lurk moar and use archive links
also, a grand jury in fucking new york city isn't going indict shit about 9/11. 100% confident they are all deep state democrats.
I think Asner is actually a critic of Israel, but a jew is still a jew.
Literally shaking reading all these posts that are deliberately downplaying the true figure of six quadrillion Jewish human mercilessly slaughtered. It is as if you are committing the shoah over and over right here in this thread
> I always wonder about that "rules of evidence." I tried looking up the definition but it did not clarify the issue much for me
Here ya go!
>If they can prove that explosives were used in taking down the towers
The best proof is "Lucky" Silverstein saying "pull it"
I love conspiracy theories.
Old news. I've been following every bit of this for some time now.
Constructive criticism: should have posted their first video of them doing podcasts from now on. I watched 2 so far and they're nice.
Also, if you want to get familiarized with some of their arguments, I encourage you to go to their videos.
That last one is fake. It was part of a (((hoax))) to prove roofers are gullible. Try finding its FOIA number if you don't believe me.
In case I'm wrong, I would download it again.
Saudi Arabia got named in the 28 pages, the (((MSM))) just didn't told the typical white burger what it meant and the typical white burger doesn't read.
SHIT!! THAT MEANS ANYONE WHO IS A BAD GOY ACCORDING TO THE NSA WILL NOT BE PART OF THIS. ON THE OTHER HAND, PEOPLE SHOWING INCREDIBLE LIKENESS TO NPCS WILL BE PICKED INSTEAD.
We have to wait 2 years to hear any progress though
Nah, I don't care for your "proof" my mind is made up that the explosives were already in place, that a BBC reporter stated WTC 7 collapsed while she was still standing in view of it and that lucky Larry Silverstein ordered to "pull it" which is a demolitions term (I worked for a demolitions company)
>Help The Lawyers’ Committee and AE911Truth raise $50,000 by December 31st to continue our legal advocacy in 2019.
It's some retarded french click-bait article that sources its story to some sketchy website asking for (((donations)))
what are you doing to help?
Nothing, of course
There is no such thing. Where do the Jews keep getting you retarded niggers who don't even know how gravity works? Go away, you're making everyone investigating the conspiracy look bad.
T I R E S O M E
Finally someone else says it!
Extra kudos if you're a burger, I know how (((education))) purposefully dumbstruck you down here.
I hope that second pic is from a chan and not theirs, too autistic.
Saved it though… got tired of Pepe the frog? Well, get ready for Jose the eagle!
Ry Dawson managed to get the TWO documents regarding the bombs found on the twin towers.
All of you antisemites disgust me. It is a historical fact that it was 6,000,000,000,0000 + ∞ to the 9th power. It wasnt just any regular planes either. They were cargo planes flown by straight white men. Full of exploding Ryder trucks. Now give us money for eternity.
if this dosen't convince you the gov did it I don't now what will
the second pic is a random find from Google images
Do you make memes or visual art? How about this copyright free character that was found in a church in the town of Malta, Austria.
Historians say it might actually be a weasel… so maybe a name like Willie or Walther?
jews took Pepe, so lets take back an image that was anyway ours before they corrupted the copyright law
That one was pretty recent, right? Somebody pointed me to is so I fired up my agitation account and commented something along the lines of "This looks absolutely awful for our justice system if you read beyond the headline. Only a kangaroo court would allow a judge to use his discretion to declare that zero evidence is necessary to settle a challenge that is completely predicated upon the delivery of evidence." Not once in my agit posting have I ever been swarmed so quickly. Not when going into a lefty hive and posting direct attacks on their ideas with the intention of getting a rise out of them. Not even close.
I posted an unvarnished, unbiased, two sentence summary of the plain truth as it was written in the article and was raged at as if I were Mengele himself. One shill got into a back and forth with me in which he'd post 2000 word replies filled with ad homs and vitriol, to which my replies were things along the lines of "I'm not even denying the holocaust (though I did let him run with that assumption for a while), I'm just claiming that this court decision almost makes a case for those that deny it."
My question is: why would that article be posted in the first place? Seems to be an attempt at putting a finger to the wind. Getting a read on the situation. The whole thing is almost too perfectly a litmus test to see how a sample group will respond to obvious evedence of foul play which is in contradiction to social conditioning. The facts of the article (whether the trial actually happened or not; perhaps it was tried in order to provide this tool) are so perfectly hypocritical that only a victim of some sort of mind control via social pressure could fail to see the hypocrisy. This is, as you all know, exactly representative of the situation we find ourselves in worldwide.
Thia hypothesis is bolstered by the fact that Schindler's list is being re-released in theaters.
If the hypothesis above is correct then I guess we should take it as evidence that at least a few people in high places are starting to worry that the deceit is faltering. Somebody I know heard a man discussing the JQ at a state RNC convention. Questioning the official narrative still isn't totally acceptable, but the fact that the JQ is even being discussed at uniparty level political events is a huge change from even a few years ago.
Jesus Christ I was once a good goy. This entire thing is a trip.
Shareblue confirmed. Lucky Larry is /ourguy/.
>They gassed me into a newt!
>I got better.
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
do You kave Any Doubt that Israel did 9/11 ?
In this LINKED VIDEO interview Chris Bollyn names the Israeli intelligence operatives who carried out the attack. He also names some American Jews that were part of the bloody crime against America.
Lots of curious facts are revealed.
I guess he's just a CIAnigger sending a message.
The proof Memestein provided was his own word that he was there and knows what happened. No wonder someone was downvoted to -79 for merely asking in the most neutral manner possible what the proof was. Later down the comments he's also attacked as an "incel."
Here's the original thread:
Link to author of "October Surprise" and coauthor of petition to US attorney in manhattan regarding 911, Barbara Honegger discussing her work on this upcoming inquiry. . First six minutes is dynamite.
All of you are wrong. Those were kike holograms.
I think you missed his point. He beleives WT7 was demoed, but that the specific video was faked to make "truthers" seem unhinged conspiracy theorists who are easily manipulated. In other words, don't be "that guy".
thanks, desu. I added this one to my collection.
Reality will continue to be suppressed
show how much money did you give to those kikes? answer.
Be charitable you fucking niggers. Anon is obviously referring to the acceleration of something in earth's surface gravity, which is plenty constant over such a minuscule difference in height. Air resistance can be neglected for skyscraper materials falling at such low speeds as well. We don't need to start calculating Ricci tensors and computing fluid dynamics. 9.8m*s^-2 is a fine enough assumption.
Clownworld makes me doubt my sanity every fucking day. We don't need SMEs with PhDs in physics and engineering to churn out hundreds of pages of detailed analysis. Anybody who doesn't see (((scam))) written all over this at first glance is a victim of social conditioning. Two of the tallest buildings in the world just collapsed nearly perfectly into their footprints despite extremely asymmetrical damage. This didn't happen once, it happened two fucking times. In addition to this, a third building collapsed perfectly into its own footprint for reasons that don't really present themselves. What the fuck am I doing in my current career? The profit margins on professional demolition must be in excess of ten thousand percent–I can't imagine the cost of hiring a group of professionals to safely demolish a skyscraper, but apparently I can just get wasted, plant a bomb or two to inflict some random structural damage and, so long as I've dumped a sufficient amount of jet fuel in proximity, the whole thing will neatly fall down. A week of my time and maybe $50,000 in materials and a bit of help. Could charge at least $5m. Probably much more.
As the ancient Romans used to ask when trying to solve a crime;
Qui bono? (Who benefits?)
2009 science paper stating advanced military glownigger explosives were found at the WTC site.
PDF required reading
sprayed on high speed high explosives that stick to any structure like a spray adhesive of foam type substance. dries hard yet slightly malleable and a dull concrete gray color.
better than shaped charge and that is why the steel was turned to powder, its "coating" was really sprayed on high tech explosive. thats also why the bodies were vaporized too.
I'm no expert but I'm breddy sure explosives don't work like that. Surrounding a piece of steel with a thin layer of explosives (even if very energetic) seems retarded. The majority of the energy will be dissipated into the surrounding air. Shaped charges are specifically designed to avoid this very problem.
Explosive coatings energetic enough to do what you described (which I don't even believe to be possible, though I could be wrong) would have to supply so much overkill energy that people nearby would be deafened. Windows of buildings in the area would be blown out.
A&E push the Holohoax lie. I saw an intro on one of their last videos. Bunch of kikes. Don't expect anything it's just another distraction.
Because he's prattling pseudoscientific drivel about nothing. How convenient that a post right next to his is about how 'we don't need knowledge of physics to analyse physical phenomena, goy', eh?
science is rel dip shit
they spent 200 trillion on something, why not explosive spray adhesive?
Don't know about coatings but i do know of a certain foam that expands rapidly. There's a video on Jewtube where they blow up an old house for fun, shit has everything catching on fire too and they didn't even use a lot of it (just one bucked IIRC).
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Found the video.
If you're referring to my post >>12561956 then you need to work on reading comprehension.
Because explosive spray adhesive is literally retarded. This isn't a cartoon. Physics applies. Putting a coating of energetics on top of the target is literally the least efficient method of destroying it. There is not a worse configuration for a given amount of energetic material than spreading it out evenly over the surface of the target.
Some anti-tank warheads utilize a "splat" of plastic explosive on the exterior of the target, but this isn't meant to destroy the tank's armor, it meant is to cause a percussive wave in the metal which induces spalling, killing the people inside with shards of metal.
hey , there you go
the fucking israeli team had access to the inner core areas of the towers for weeks leading up to 9/11 too. they couldve been spraying this shit in there for weeks
spray explosive adhesive allowed to dry then covered with a layer of sprayed on concrete. that would be plausible.
i say they have perfected advanced exotic high speed explosive sprays and then they coat the spray with a hard resin or a concrete
I could maybe believe that it's due to impedance matching between the explosives and the concrete, but then I'm no expert on shockwave propagation.
>This isn't a cartoon.
Then you should read up on the assassination attempts on Castro. They went full ACME-tier on that.
>containing an explosive that can supposedly vapourise steel
The weaker concrete would fail first and the blast would be directed away from the steel, not harming it at all. You fucking idiot. You can't contain explosive pressure within an apparatus too weak to sustain high pressures, and concrete shatters when you hit it with a fucking hammer. The density and hardness of steel is not even comparable. Get out.
>government opens new investigation to clear itself of wrongdoing
ZOG will never arrest ZOG.
>this is important news
No, nothing will come of it. Only justice that's going to happen will be outside of the jewed subverted courts of "law."
>spray explosive adhesive allowed to dry then covered with a layer of sprayed on concrete. that would be plausible.
It would be plausible for it to blow off the concrete and leave the metal relatively untouched IMHO.
Pic 1 a pile of the core columns there were 48 that stretched from the foundation to the top. They were 4" thick at the bottom and tapered to 1/4" at the top.
Pic 2 the seemingly sparse and and not very robust iron construction that actually comprised the base of the towers
tldr spray on explosives are the fiction of hollywood movies and some small real world applications, when they mine they drill holes and place the charges in the rocks to be removed
>I don't think I should have to wait two years before posting this.
Also, taking this seriously. 0/10
He's either a shill here to distract or somebody too far gone in ignorance and tinfoil to see that inexplicable, exotic explosives do not add anything to the story other than incredulity.
To the retard >>12562209:
Shaped charges and incendiaries that are more than adequate to quickly and neatly demolish a building exist. The tech is here and it is known. Say whatever you'd like. Filtered.
One of the things on the shekels side that doesn't seem to get picked up on is the metric fuckloads Lucky Larry saved and continues to save on expenses. I've often seen (((people))) arguing that he didn't really earn anything, that insurance really only covered what he lost, or that he lost shitloads in lost revenue when all his tenants were turned in hamburger.
>WTC 1&2 are practically condemned shithole towers, packed with asbestos which would have cost assloads to renovate.
>The only reason reason that they hadn't just been outright demolished was that the Port Authority, who were responsible for the towers couldn't afford to pull it, would have cost gorillions.
>Because no sane person even wanted to look at the place, because there was no possible way to profit from the towers, Shekelstein was able to get a 99-year lease on the property at absolute rock fucking bottom rates
<lel, this dum fagit gonna have to pay to have our towers fixed or replaced
>His lease was for the property, not the towers or whatever other developments might be constructed in their place
>He also didn't actually own the towers, he just managed them and was entitled to the revenue he was able to generate with the towers
>Year 2001 (not 2 months after signing the lease), war were beginning
>Free demolition due to airmail delivery of thermite c/o steel beams
>Larry gets 4+ billions for towers
>Continues to pay rent as per lease agreement, ends up losing several millions because rubble storage isn't a profitable business (or so we are expected to believe)
>During this interim, 9/11 memorials in the form of inverted black cubes are constructed to defile ground zero
>1WTC to be built as bold Fuck You Muslim, symbol of American pride, and most expensive tower to ever be built in the world ever
>Designed by Libeskind, renowned (((architect))), many of his works are (((renovations))), wherein he defaces beautiful goyim architecture with garish spikes of steel and presumably goyim foreskins, though that's a tangent for a different discussion
>(((cohincidentically))), 1WTC is a six pointed star when viewed from above
>Cornerstone laid by a Mr Finkelstein, though goyim aren't allowed to know what it says
>Back on topic, multiple billion dollar tower to be erected, of which Sheckelstein chips in a mere $1B, with the taxpayers covering lion's share
>Sheckelstein's remaining billions from payout never seen again, presumably used to help feed starving holocaust survivors
>What a swell guy, he lost so much money, and yet he still gives to help those in need
>Oh yeah, remember that super expensive pimped out tower that fucking everyone thinks is cooler 'n tits and wants to
>Locked in at dogshit cheap rates for another 80+ years
Yeah, Larry really got screwed on that deal.
No, that's actually a thing. Traditionally they work by firing plastique at high velocity, which then goes splat once it hits the target, though I see no reason why it couldn't be applied using alternative methods.
>shaped charge = punch hole
>hesh = transfer shockwave into target
No WTC 7? might as well not investigate shit.
This is pure hope porn, the acquittal will indemnify Lucky Larry.
>the corrupt jewish bureaucracy is going to remind everyone that BUSH DID NOT DO 9/11 AND THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIONS in preparation for another false-flag attack to permit war with Iran
Woooow. I am so interested in this. I'm sure that THIS TIME something will happen.
>No, that's actually a thing. Traditionally they work by firing plastique at high velocity, which then goes splat once it hits the target, though I see no reason why it couldn't be applied using alternative methods.
>>shaped charge = punch hole
>>hesh = transfer shockwave into target
HESH isn't meant to destroy the tank. It is meant to shred the people inside. And, as you mentioned, it has the benefit of a 120mm cartridge's worth of energy forcing it into the armor as it spreads (significant at these timescales and not completely unlike having a metal backing of some sort).
I'm familiar with the industry.
There's no physical way that a given energetic compound will ever be more effective when spread over the surface of a beam than when placed in a concentrated, shaped charge. That faggot I filtered who keeps sticking to his batman universe is grasping at straws to save an absurd argument.
Holey jeebus what the fuck is that shit? That's insane.
I feel like I should start cataloging all the fake hope-happenings that pop up. It looks very much like the jews in media and in government fabricate these stories to give the illusion something is being done to put them in jail when in reality it's a fake investigation to acquit them. More importantly, it's to stall whites and prevent whites from taking justice into their hands.
As long as people still think the jewish-owned government will arrest itself, no one will lift the finger better placed on a trigger fired at jews.
Just went back and reread his post, which now says something completely different than what I thought it do'd. No clue how I tism'd it that hard; at the time, I thought he was being a faggot and mocking you for implying that hesh could be a thing, but it turns out he was just a faggot
An israeli van found with explosives on that day? Pure cohencidence
Basically anything that gets any kind of fanfare bullshit is kiked to hell and back
>Have secret list of banned books
>Covertly seize and inspect packages in mail
>Vanguard Books and customers routinely targeted
>Vanguard ask for list of banned books so they can inform their customers that perhaps they should reconsider their order, as it may not arrive
<Dere iz no banned book lists, we a free speech nation
>Canada Stazi accidentally leaves list attached to seized package, which makes it's way back to Vanguard
>Muzlums throwing shitfit over Satanist book upsetting their sensibilities
>(((everybody))) flips the fuck out
>Bookstores, MSM, govt, etc. make huge scene
<We is civilized nation, and in civilized nations, freedom of speech is sacred human rights
<Hey goyim, buy this book because fuck muzlims pieces of shittings
>Every leafy man, woman, dog, child, furfag, human buttplug, and miscellaneous uncategorizable wastes of oxygen buys the book and chants Fuck Muzlims, to show the world that nobody tells them what to do
Obviously, this example is from quite a while back
((They))) openly mock us in Israel.
Shmuel - one of the five dancing Israelis whose celebration of the towers and Americans burning led to the police seizure of the vans from Urban Moving Systems - got married on September 11th one year after the mass murder.
The date of course marks his successful mission against us Goyim.
Way to samefag, kike. Nobody is falling for your shit.
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Here's the documentary in question if anybody is interested. Might be useful for redpilling friends, it looks pretty normie-friendly.
>Setpember 11, 2014
>Married for 12 years
Anon that means they got married before the 9/11 attacks.
shit why did i read that as 2004? wow that is strange.
how is 2002 not a year after 2001?
no. this is the one thing that all real americans could rally behind.
I misread it i thought it said 2004
i see, missed that other post you made
confusion spreads like wildfire..
That wasn't me, nigger. "Freefall speed" does not exist, objects accelerate as they are attracted to a massive object (in this case the planet). Things neither instantly begin at any set speed nor quit accelerating at any set speed. Did you actually graduate high school or what?
that's not even close to what happened.
in this video >>12560624 you can see the exact same windows that were blown out in the first video >>12560496
There is no trickery except for the gas-lighting going on in this thread right now
this post was for you: >>12564240
sorry about the mixup, I selected your post by mistake
I watched it live. What always got to me was 1) How all four Legs/Structure of the Square Table/Building Collapsed Symmetrically (times X stories worth) and 2) BOTH Tables/Buildings Collapsed Exactly Identically (what are the odds of both those things occurring?).
Both Landing on Their Small Footprint, While Neither Table/Building Tilted in Any Direction Whatsoever (Below Damaged Areas), which would have then Collided with other surrounding buildings (#7) like dominoes, etc.? And Why did the Tops not just Skip/Slide off?
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Donald Trump Speaks on 911
Whether you like him or hate him, this LINKED VIDEO is a curious thing. It's less than 4 minutes long
Trump was interviewed in NYC on the day of the attack and he expressed certainty that something more than just the planes hitting the buildings was at work to cause so much destruction. He pointed out that the Twin Towers were wrapped in steel, and he suggested bombs had been used on the towers.
IT'S AN AMAZING 4 MINUTES,
command + f 'dustification'
Holy fuck could you imagine hearing this shit on Fox. Fucking wew
I'm not that guy, but I'll point out again that you're a stupid nigger (I already have once). If you had ever taken a slightly rigorous math or physics course (not much, just the basics… high school level calculus based physics would be enough) you would realize that when one sets up a system consisting of an object falling under the influence of gravity, the system is completely defined. Newton's equations give us a complete picture of the system as far as Newtonian physics is concerned. If you drop an apple from a given height, not only is the acceleration at all times known ("g"), the velocity and position are similarly specified for all time. This fact allows for more interesting and useful formulations of the same principles to be created: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.
"Free fall speed" does not imply a single, static speed. It implies a linearly increasing speed with a rate of increase proportional to the acceleration. This further implies that the position (trajectory) forms a parabolic arc. There is no difference in saying "free fall acceleration", "free fall speed", or "free fall trajectory". They're a set of parameters constrained and defined by Newton and boundary conditions.
As I wrote earlier: you know what he meant, be more charitable.
>Did you actually graduate high school or what?
Go learn yourself something or fellate a shotgun, nigger. Calling out terminology that everybody understands in a thread about 9/11 conspiracies is the stupidest way to try to impress anons that I've stumbled across for at least a few days. Maybe a whole week.
Do you have the version without the annoying music in the video? IE RAW.
you are all wrong, technically. Maximum speed can be reached, it's called terminal velocity. that speed will depend on resistance to the object. However, a building falling wouldn't reach terminal velocity.
>I think Asner is actually a critic of Israel, but a jew is still a jew.
I deserve to be beaten for suggesting the following but if there is anything more than a fake schism between the kikes this would be an excellent occasion to put the boot into israel and prove there is any possiblity some can be left to live among us.
I know this is corrupt thinking and plan to throw the first punch as soon as I let my guard down.
I also watched it live, and both buildings collapsed from the top downward, which is not how demolitions work (if you've ever watched a controlled one).
Also, if they were going to do this, why bother crashing planes? It makes zero sense because doing so introduces uncontrollable variables into something supposedly controlled. The impact could have damaged the wires that would have had to be threaded all throughout the structure to the explosives (there are NO remote-controlled explosives of this type because random radio interference could set them off prematurely), and certainly would have damaged/destroyed the explosives in that section. It also could have caused unpredictable damage that may have caused the towers to fall at an angle.
If they wanted to blow them up with explosives, saying that a terrorist snuck explosives into there (and then covering up the controlled demolition with a large but low-velocity theatrical explosion in the lower levels) would have sufficed and been perfectly predictable.
Now it's still very possible (indeed probable) that the "inside job" was crashing airplanes into the towers. And maybe their later collapses was predicted, maybe it wasn't. But to suggest that it was a controlled demolition with precision explosives is idiotic. You're telling me that for weeks or months before 9/11 there were explosives being planted all through the fucking building, and of the thousands of people who worked there every day, NOBODY NOTICED? Nobody said anything? Nobody took even one, single, solitary picture of a charge attached to one of those steel beams? Nobody whom they presumably paid off to keep their mouth shut about said explosives later decided to blow the whistle?
>(there are NO remote-controlled explosives of this type because random radio interference could set them off prematurely),
This entire post is an example of misleading bull shit more clever anons than I can point out the various techniques being used.
I will destroy the no radio waves because the howard stern radio show might interfere and blow up to soon.
Pic related arms the device then boom when blow up signal comes in.
((( >>12565020 )))
> (((judy wood)))
((( >>12565018 )))
reported for being a mossad shill
>hurr durr durr "freefal speed"
Speaking of WTC7, Larry Silverstein had already worked on the new building BEFORE the attack… they had the plans ready and everything
pretty ure it was a coincidence :^)
>I also watched it live, and both buildings collapsed from the top downward, which is not how demolitions work (if you've ever watched a controlled one).
Controlled demolitions aren't about top-down or bottoms up, it's about demolishing a building into their own imprint with minimal displacement
just like all 3 buildings did
>Controlled demolitions aren't about top-down or bottoms up
Exactly however lets add this salient point as well.
How ever they fucking blew up the buildings none of the tenets of actual controlled demolition were in play.
They created one giant ass spectacular made for tv extravaganza with zero fucks given for safety of any property and ESPECIALLY HUMAN LIFE
ps the guy you replied to is a faggot shill
bump, shitty threads are possibly trying to kill this off
WTC 7 housed many of the IRS documents related to the Eron fraud, who filed Bankruptcy 2 months after 9/11… fraud charges were brought against Enron, but the documents linking the US Government to Enron were destroyed on 9/11. Not to mention the gold stolen from the vaults under WTC 7. Just days after 9/11, people went down to the vaults and filmed. They found the vault doors wide open as if explosives were used, and all of the gold was gone. I really hope 9/11 gets exposed to the public for the fraud that it really was.
One thing we have in our corner is if they conclude that the building were brought down via controlled demo. So this case is mostly about the how, eg controlled demo, once that is proved then we move onto the (((who and why)))
The gold was in the basement of building 6
How can people look at this and discount the possibility of rubble from the twin towers simply knocking the ground floor out?
I've always had the same problem with these videos its too difficult to tell visually from the outside whether it collapsed from explosives or just being knocked out by proximity to the collapses.
>You're telling me that for weeks or months before 9/11 there were explosives being planted all through the fucking building, and of the thousands of people who worked there every day, NOBODY NOTICED?
There were secret or rented floors to certain ((( people )))
interesting fact: i live in NYC and was in highschool at the time it happened. someone with my mothers name died in the WTC. weeks after it happened we got a call from the college she graduated from sending their condolences to us–well–directly to my mother, whom happened to pick up the phone.
she told us about this and we all just kind of went "huh. thats freaky"
i always felt this was odd, since its not a common name, but also not a super rare one either. but how did the college not know? how did they hear about the death? who told them in the first place? does this happen all the time to people named john smith? the whole thing never sat right with me.
years later i saw a plaque with all the WTC victims on it, making up the shape of the twin towers. i noticed it was in alphabetical order… i skimmed through it and there it was; my moms name.
OH WOW THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - WHICH IS TOTALLY OWNED BY JEWS AND OILMUDS - IS GOING TO INVESTIGATE ITSELF FOR WRONG-DOING!?
I BET THEY'RE GOING TO GET THOSE SCHEMING ISRAELIS THIS TIME!
>ZOG will surely prosecute ZOG!
… Its all so tiresome.
and once theyre investigated, they wont have to investigate ever again. isnt that neat? it'll be solved once and for all.
whew, you're glowing brightly there, kid
Don't let him sap your energy. Just call him out for be a glow in the dark nigger
>Don't let him sap your energy. Just call him out for be a glow in the dark nigger
It could be any variety of shills I am not smart enough to figure out which is which. However there are a ton of anons on this board far younger than I am and were kids when 911 happened. Also there are older anons that might not be technically astute and pass off the post as "yeah I guess that makes sense". So it is in this spirit that I point out the most egregious of claims.
I pretty much think the buildings were pre loaded with radio controlled explosives in a variety of configurations all placed in the core of the building on the 48 core columns. You could set them around the clock with out anyone seeing you, because they all would be placed in the mechanical chase portion of the building or where all the elevators run up and down and the plumbing etc. Can anyone imagine how much spaghetti would be involved to attach a wire to everyone of the charges that would be needed to completely blow them up?
So you get them all set and then you have a computer control the firing order and look at any video of the buildings collapsing and you see the blow outs occurring 5 or more floors below the collapse wave. They had a variety of explosives in order to accomplish their task. Some of it was c4 shaped charges, some was thermite/thermate cutting charges on the really thick structural steel, it was NOT just one type of conventional type of device but rather a variety designed to give the most spectacular fx ever broadcast on tv.
This scene does not completely satisfy me though. Look at the aftermath pictures, not one chunk or large slab of concrete from a 100 floors of poured concrete floors. Not one intact/smashed/twisted file cabinet or desk or office chair or even a desk telephone from a 100 floors of offices. Not one recognizable toilet or sink or stall steel divider/door from 100 floors of bathrooms. It all turned to dust
THERE WAS PAPER EVERYWHERE BUT NOTHING THAT ORIGINALLY HELD THE PAPER
I studied this until I finally burned out I hope you younger guys can finally find out what happened I am pretty much resigned to the fact I wont.
So the reason why controlled demolitions ALWAYS use wires instead of being remotely-detonated is… what exactly? Please explain, because clearly you're the SMART one, here.
>There were secret floors that nobody knew about
I'm putting this one right up there next to chemtrails.
>I pretty much think
Good for you.
>So the reason why controlled demolitions ALWAYS use wires instead of being remotely-detonated is… what exactly?
It is easier for a 5 or10 story building that has been cleaned out of everything or even a stadium. There is no access to the site it is guarded while they are placing the charges. You can poke a hole anywhere through a wall or floor to run wires. And I would say it is probably a lot cheaper as well you basically only need thermostat wire to run to each charge.
Now when has a 100 story building ever been demoed up until 911 or since?
Answer is never.
Tallest building ever was 47 floors
Price is no object results are all that matters. Make up all the charges somewhere bring them into the building or maybe they were built in the towers who knows. Each charge has an identifying code on it like 88-14 it goes on the 88th floor column number 14. Hit the on switch and it is ready to go. They could also test everything and see how far away and what type of signal would be needed to arm and detonate the charges.
And somehow this technology does not exist? Or it would be too cost prohibitive to use?
Or is it somehow we have to conflate what is normally used to blow up buildings as the only way these could be done as well or it just would not work because reasons
I can also ride the bus because I paid to ride
>You're a nigger and it's like you aren't even trying to hide your shit trap.
>Canada Stazi accidentally leaves list attached to seized package
Any copy of this list floating around? Also any links to more sites talking about Canadian mail fuckery? As a fuckin' leaf it would be very valuable info. I know Harold Covington's books get confiscated if they ever pass the Canadian border, but beyond that I'm in the dark as to our banned books.
This place has been Zogged for so long nobody realizes we're in a straight up tyranny. But they love their "velvet fist" approach where they ban books but they don't announce it so officially there's no banned book list but you can't distribute the banned books on your own dime. I've been thinking of making some propaganda for leafs to this effect, since nothing is more tantalizing than forbidden fruit.
ALAN SNACKBAR mate - about fucking time too!!
is this true? or is it Bollocks ….
I like bollocks but my own, so I rather not be deceived because I will find you.. and I will finger you!!
It's pretty revealing to see the shills here desperately trying to shout down the entire grand jury as futile. But even though the wheels of justice move slowly they are moving. Even a cynical negative observer like Paul Craig Roberts sees some hope here.
A Majority of Americans Do Not Believe the Official 9/11 Story
“Conspiracy Theorists” Now A Majority
By Paul Craig Roberts
TruePublica, a British website that has avoided the 9/11 issue, has had its fill of ignorant journalists at the BBC, Huffington Post and other propagandists for the military/security complex. The constant, shrill demeaning of experts and distinguished people who have raised questions about the official story has convinced TruePublica that skeptics who need so much shouting down must have a point.
The media has NEVER EXAMINED the evidence or explained the analysis provided by scientists, architects, engineers, pilots, and the first responders who experienced the explosions of the World Trade Center twin towers. The media has never asked for the release of the multiple videos that recorded whatever struck the Pentagon. The media has never investigated whether cell phones worked in 2001 from the altitudes at which the official story claims calls were made.
Instead two-bit punk presstitutes, such as the BBC’s Chris Bell and the Huffington Post’s Jess Brammer andl Chris York, label experts with knowledge and integrity “conspiracy theorists.” These presstitutes knowingly use a cover-up term that the CIA put into use via its media assets to discredit the expert skeptics of the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of President Kennedy.
The fact that the carefully presented evidence is NEVER ENGAGED EXCEPT WITH NAME-CALLING is a strong indication that the evidence is true and cannot be refuted.
the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry has presented enough hard facts to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to force his compliance with the provisions of federal law that require the convening of a federal grand jury to investigate for the first time the attacks of September 11, 2001. https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
This puts the US Justice (sic) Department in an extraordinary position. There will be tremendous pressures on the US Attorney’s office to have the grand jury dismiss the evidence as an unpatriotic conspiracy theory or otherwise maneuver to discredit the evidence presented by the Lawyers’ Committee, or modify the official account without totally discrediting it.
“What the 9/11 truthers and the Lawyers’ Committee have achieved is the destruction of the designation of 9/11 skeptics as “conspiracy theorists.” No US Attorney would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly, the evidence is compelling that has put the US Attorney in an unenviable position.”
If the Lawyers’ Committee and the 9/11 truthers trust the US Attorney to go entirely by the facts, little will come of the grand jury. If the United States had a rule of law, something as serious as 9/11 could not have gone for 17 years without investigation.”
September Clues and The VicSim Report = best 9/11 material.
>THERE WAS PAPER EVERYWHERE BUT NOTHING THAT ORIGINALLY HELD THE PAPER
Most paper in offices is still in unused condition; 500-sheet reams and reams and reams of copier/printer paper. Usually reams are stored out in the open, an open shelf, a pile in a corner. Most printer/copier paper ends up in recycle bins, which are also wide open and omnipresent; every office's copier area has a recycle bin, every cubical has one. So the overwhelming majority of paper in the towers wasn't really contained in anything.
inb4 committee members commit suicide out of the blue, or get in car crash, or have collective heart attacks, or get threatened and conclude the investigation quickly.
They got a whole host of tricks to kill them with.
At this point, some facts are clear behind 9/11:
- the OP is done by controlled demolition
- the planes hit, but just to provide emotional point and more dying people/spectacle
- Pentagon MIGHT not be hit and a total fake out
- Israel is behind it, US administration allows it to happen, Saudi Arabia supports the patsies
- the goal: toppling of Saddam Hussel, then a rogue element in the Middle East that could endanger Israel, and the further infantilization of americans.
>somebody please punch that fucker on video.
The core structure looks unharmed in this pic.
This must be before the thermite was set off.
The WTC 7 video you posted is a known internet fake.
It was to prove conspiracy theorists "will believe everything."
what does e team mean?
Fucking prove it.
Here you go.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not call you a shill this time.
Those aren't detonations. What you're seeing is backfire from the UFO passing by, which is not uncommon for a torsion propulsion engine using the wrong grade of unobtainium in the flux capacitor. +if you look closely at the flying saucer, you'll see COSCO clearly written on the side.
Translation: It's not even from outer space. It's a back engineered Chinese knockoff purchased from China Overseas Company by the reptilian elite out f Northern Cali
when military tribunals and justice no longer exist, ….
What is the thinking on why they would even take the chance of using explosives when they're crashing huge passenger planes into the buildings?
side note: what would you feel as the second pilot seeing the first tower still standing?
NO, DON'T INVESTIGATE 9/11, GOYIM!
What a cringeworthy faggot.
Kill yourself you stupid retard.
>WTC 7 video anon posted is fake
No doubt, but so what?
Red Herring faggots love to derail from the actual discussion of facts. Edward Current is only good for satire. If he is actually trying to prove a point, it didn't add anything to the actual discussion.
>Stand with Trump
Nope. He's part of the illuminati. He's not doing shit about the crimes committed by our government for 9/11.
haha terrible on every level of design..
THE STEEL WAS SO HOT IT GOT WEAK AND THEN PRECIPITOUSLY COLLAPSED
>means that for the first time real rules of evidence will have to be applied to the investigation and not just the convenient suppositions of zionist controlled media
>I don't think I should have to wait two years before posting this.
you do, if you had waited 2 years you wouldn't have posted this. if you dont understand, you might in 2 years (if you listen to the right posters)
>it's the grand jury that will make a decision
>it's irrelevant that the "evidence" is a bunch of fabrications by a committee presided over by Jews
You are an absolute retard if you believe that some barrels of kerosene could heat up steel to lose it's structural strength. It simply doesn't burn at that temperature. Physics won't abide for your lies.
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Painfully obvious if an anon checks out
It's not ayy lmao technolog used though. It is well known among the deep state niggers. These "energy cannons" are in low Earth orbit and can be aimed at anything to vaporize it in seconds. There is footage from ameteur stargazers who finds these "Star Wars project" satellites all over the place.
Hutchison effect all over the place.
These kikels love them too.
>You are an absolute retard if you believe that some barrels of kerosene could heat up steel to lose it's structural strength. It simply doesn't burn at that temperature. Physics won't abide for your lies.
Too bad irony and sarcasm are beyond your wits.
I was commenting on the fact a woman could stand in the hole made by the aircraft and the steel was so hot it made the building collapse but she was comfortable leaning against what should have been a 800F steel beam.